Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crosswalk Markings results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 287 hits . Analysis detected 2,161 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,774 of 37,536 keywords). This Crosswalk Markings is worse (more manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group. Crosswalk Markings
Keyword details
Total words: 2,396
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.0% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst