Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Crocodiles results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 43.7% saturation with 1,140 hits . Analysis detected 5,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,607 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 36,715 keywords). This Crocodiles is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Crocodiles
Keyword details
Total words: 2,607
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 43.7% 43.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.4% 16.4% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 19.6% 19.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 43.7%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.4%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 3.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Red Herring: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst