Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Critical Response results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 1,932 hits. Analysis detected 10,311 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (31,431 of 35,902 keywords). This Critical Response is better (less manipulative) than 87.50% of the peer group.
Critical Response
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠13%Critical Response (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 16,908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510012.5% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles16.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos