Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos693 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Criminal Punishment results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 619 hits. Analysis detected 2,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,772 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,181 of 37,536 keywords). This Criminal Punishment is worse (more manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group.
Criminal Punishment
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
68%Criminal Punishment (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,772
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

68% percentile
025507510067.6% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 22.3%22.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Horn Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.0%Straw Man: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%Tu Quoque: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate