Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 693 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Criminal Punishment results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 619 hits . Analysis detected 2,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,772 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,181 of 37,536 keywords). This Criminal Punishment is worse (more manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Criminal Punishment
Keyword details
Total words: 2,772
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.6% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 22.3% 22.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.0% Straw Man: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9% Tu Quoque: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst