Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,303 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Covid Czar results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 1,317 hits. Analysis detected 9,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (8,002 of 37,536 keywords). This Covid Czar is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Covid Czar
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
79%Covid Czar (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,212
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510078.7% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 17.0%17.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 20.4%20.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 13.2%13.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.2%15.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 25.3%25.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos