Keyword summary
44%2 analyzed articles/videos2,328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coup Detat results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 721 hits. Analysis detected 5,783 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,257 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (24,557 of 34,832 keywords). This Coup Detat is better (less manipulative) than 70.50% of the peer group.
Coup Detat
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
30%Coup Detat (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,257
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

30% percentile
025507510029.5% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.1%6.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos