Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Cost Of War results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 638 hits. Analysis detected 4,192 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,244 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Cost Of War is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Cost Of War
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Cost Of War (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,244
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos