Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Corrections Reform results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.4% saturation with 270 hits . Analysis detected 2,876 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,789 keywords). This Corrections Reform is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Corrections Reform
Keyword details
Total words: 5,008
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst