Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Corporate Democrats results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ad Hominem, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 467 hits. Analysis detected 2,393 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,602 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Corporate Democrats is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Corporate Democrats
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Corporate Democrats (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,602
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 26.6%26.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 29.1%29.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 29.1%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 26.6%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos