Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video919 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cooking Gas results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 408 hits. Analysis detected 2,905 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,757 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,745 of 37,536 keywords). This Cooking Gas is worse (more manipulative) than 76.70% of the peer group.
Cooking Gas
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
77%Cooking Gas (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,757
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

77% percentile
025507510076.7% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 11.5%11.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos