Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 964 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Convencion Democrata results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , In-Group Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 513 hits . Analysis detected 3,074 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,856 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (23,235 of 37,528 keywords). This Convencion Democrata is better (less manipulative) than 61.90% of the peer group. Convencion Democrata
Keyword details
Total words: 3,856
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst