Keyword summary
⁠4%2 analyzed articles/videos2,699 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Controlled Burns results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 2,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,987 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (36,968 of 37,321 keywords). This Controlled Burns is better (less manipulative) than 99.10% of the peer group.
Controlled Burns
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠1%Controlled Burns (selected)1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,987
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

1% percentile
02550751000.9% percentile
1.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos