Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video825 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumers Council Of Missouri results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 764 hits. Analysis detected 3,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,475 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (7,807 of 37,536 keywords). This Consumers Council Of Missouri is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Consumers Council Of Missouri
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠80%Consumers Council Of Missouri (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,475
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510079.2% percentile
4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 16.1%16.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.7%9.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 30.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 2.5%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.0%Straw Man: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Special Pleading: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos