Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,293 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conrail results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 644 hits. Analysis detected 3,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,879 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,773 of 37,536 keywords). This Conrail is better (less manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Conrail
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
42%Conrail (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,879
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

42% percentile
025507510042.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 16.6%16.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos