Keyword summary
⁠57%2 analyzed articles/videos1,770 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Candidates results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 911 hits. Analysis detected 6,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,310 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (16,139 of 37,536 keywords). This Congressional Candidates is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group.
Congressional Candidates
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,310
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510057.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 17.2%17.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos