Keyword summary
42% 2 analyzed articles/videos 890 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Campaign results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Pessimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 464 hits . Analysis detected 2,991 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,560 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,635 of 37,536 keywords). This Congressional Campaign is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group. Congressional Campaign
Keyword details
Total words: 3,560
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst