Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 233 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Boundaries results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 36.8% saturation with 257 hits . Analysis detected 1,567 faulty-reasoning hits from 698 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,732 of 37,536 keywords). This Congressional Boundaries is worse (more manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group. Congressional Boundaries
Keyword details
Total words: 698
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.4% percentile 10.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles698 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 26.5% 26.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 36.8% 36.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 16.3% 16.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 19.5% 19.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 16.6% 16.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 36.8%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 24.2%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 26.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 9.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst