Keyword summary
85% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congress Budget Shutdown House results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 571 hits . Analysis detected 3,625 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,432 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 64% (13,087 of 35,712 keywords). This Congress Budget Shutdown House is worse (more manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. Congress Budget Shutdown House
Keyword details
Total words: 3,432
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.4% percentile 3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst