Keyword summary
32% 2 analyzed articles/videos 612 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Compute Capacity results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 589 hits . Analysis detected 3,701 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,054 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (26,013 of 37,536 keywords). This Compute Capacity is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. Compute Capacity
Keyword details
Total words: 6,054
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Horn Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst