Keyword summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video1,102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community Relations results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 380 hits. Analysis detected 4,045 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,306 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (12,363 of 36,599 keywords). This Community Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Community Relations
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠67%Community Relations (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,306
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510066.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos