Keyword summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These College Softball results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 420 hits . Analysis detected 3,018 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,301 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This College Softball is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. College Softball
Keyword details
Total words: 2,301
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 18.3% 18.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst