Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These College Softball results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 420 hits. Analysis detected 3,018 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,301 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This College Softball is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
College Softball
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%College Softball (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,301
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 18.3%18.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 12.6%12.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos