Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Football Spring Games results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Indoctrination , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.8% saturation with 1,298 hits . Analysis detected 6,803 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,432 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,226 of 34,692 keywords). This College Football Spring Games is worse (more manipulative) than 76.30% of the peer group. College Football Spring Games
Keyword details
Total words: 3,432
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.3% percentile 4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 37.8% 37.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 20.8% 20.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 21.6% 21.6% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 37.8%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst