Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 217 analyzed words
BS Summary: These College Football Bowl Season results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Recency Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34.3% saturation with 223 hits . Analysis detected 1,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 651 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,850 of 37,536 keywords). This College Football Bowl Season is worse (more manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group. College Football Bowl Season
Keyword details
Total words: 651
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 95.1% percentile 10.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles651 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 26.7% 26.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 27.6% 27.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 18.9% 18.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 34.3% 34.3% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 34.3%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 27.6%, sitewide 6.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 26.7%, sitewide 2.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 4.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Red Herring: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst