Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 877 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Collective Bargaining Agreement results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 689 hits . Analysis detected 4,473 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 66% (12,941 of 37,536 keywords). This Collective Bargaining Agreement is worse (more manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Collective Bargaining Agreement
Keyword details
Total words: 3,508
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.5% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.6% 19.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst