Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,492 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Coatesville Homelessness Chester County results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 1,239 hits. Analysis detected 4,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (27,002 of 37,536 keywords). This Coatesville Homelessness Chester County is better (less manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Coatesville Homelessness Chester County
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 5,968
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

28% percentile
025507510028.1% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 20.8%20.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos