Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cleveland Cavaliers results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 550 hits . Analysis detected 5,254 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,420 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (20,496 of 37,536 keywords). This Cleveland Cavaliers is better (less manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group. Cleveland Cavaliers
Keyword details
Total words: 5,420
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst