Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clemson Tigers results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Status Quo Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 378 hits . Analysis detected 3,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 79% (7,397 of 34,417 keywords). This Clemson Tigers is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Clemson Tigers
Keyword details
Total words: 2,148
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.5% percentile 4.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.6% 17.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst