Keyword summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 706 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clean Air Minnesota results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 415 hits . Analysis detected 3,624 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,118 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,090 of 35,445 keywords). This Clean Air Minnesota is worse (more manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group. Clean Air Minnesota
Keyword details
Total words: 2,118
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.0% percentile 5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 19.6% 19.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst