Keyword summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Claude Fable 5 results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Fundamental Attribution Error , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.9% saturation with 552 hits . Analysis detected 3,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,217 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Claude Fable 5 is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Claude Fable 5
Keyword details
Total words: 2,217
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 24.9% 24.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Fundamental Attribution E⦠Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Tu Quoque: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst