Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,527 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clairvoyants results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 828 hits. Analysis detected 6,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,573 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,563 of 37,536 keywords). This Clairvoyants is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Clairvoyants
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
72%Clairvoyants (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,573
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510071.9% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 18.1%18.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.9%9.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 12.5%12.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos