Keyword summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video1,507 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claiming Benefits results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 1,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,521 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (35,505 of 36,933 keywords). This Claiming Benefits is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
Claiming Benefits
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠4%Claiming Benefits (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,521
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751003.9% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos