Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Civil Rights Violations results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 640 hits. Analysis detected 6,699 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,960 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Civil Rights Violations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Civil Rights Violations
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Civil Rights Violations (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,960
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.7%5.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos