Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,281 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civic Joy Fund results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 806 hits . Analysis detected 3,989 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,124 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (19,583 of 35,597 keywords). This Civic Joy Fund is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. Civic Joy Fund
Keyword details
Total words: 5,124
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst