Keyword summary
ā 89% 1 analyzed article/video 624 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City Leadership results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 541 hits . Analysis detected 3,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ā 79% (11,060 of 52,214 keywords). This City Leadership is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group. City Leadership
Keyword details
Total words: 2,496
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.8% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.7% 21.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Fundamental Attribution E⦠Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.6% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst