Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos910 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City-County Merger results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 444 hits. Analysis detected 3,595 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,822 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,320 of 37,536 keywords). This City-County Merger is worse (more manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
City-County Merger
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
89%City-County Merger (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,822
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

89% percentile
025507510088.5% percentile
6.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 19.4%19.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 19.5%19.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 15.3%15.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 24.4%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 19.5%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 8.1%Composition/Division: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate