Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,030 analyzed words
BS Summary: These City Budgets results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 719 hits . Analysis detected 5,864 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,548 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (26,301 of 37,533 keywords). This City Budgets is better (less manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group. City Budgets
Keyword details
Total words: 7,548
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst