Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos4,581 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Citizens United results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 1,649 hits. Analysis detected 11,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,324 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (34,268 of 35,668 keywords). This Citizens United is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
Citizens United
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
4%Citizens United (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 18,324
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751003.9% percentile
1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles18.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate