Keyword summary
9%1 analyzed article/video1,120 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Circus Arts results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 149 hits. Analysis detected 1,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,480 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 4% (52,153 of 54,220 keywords). This Circus Arts is better (less manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group.
Circus Arts
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
4%Circus Arts (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,480
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751003.8% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos