Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,006 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cindy O'laughlin results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 870 hits . Analysis detected 6,313 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,746 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (34,496 of 37,536 keywords). This Cindy O'laughlin is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Cindy O'laughlin
Keyword details
Total words: 11,746
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst