Keyword summary
40% 2 analyzed articles/videos 939 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Waller results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 381 hits . Analysis detected 2,456 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,756 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (20,494 of 36,204 keywords). This Christopher Waller is better (less manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group. Christopher Waller
Keyword details
Total words: 3,756
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst