Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video616 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christoper Nolan results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Bandwagon, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 617 hits. Analysis detected 3,085 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (6,883 of 37,536 keywords). This Christoper Nolan is worse (more manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
Christoper Nolan
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠82%Christoper Nolan (selected)6%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,464
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510081.7% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 25.0%25.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 25.0%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 2.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate