Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 745 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christmas Nfl results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 52.2% saturation with 1,165 hits . Analysis detected 4,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,231 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,831 of 37,536 keywords). This Christmas Nfl is worse (more manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group. Christmas Nfl
Keyword details
Total words: 2,231
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.1% percentile 6.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 52.2% 52.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 22.0% 22.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 24.0% 24.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 52.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.0%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.0% No True Scotsman: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.7% Straw Man: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst