Keyword summary
⁠15%1 analyzed article/video865 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christa Pike results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 1,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,460 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (49,793 of 58,096 keywords). This Christa Pike is better (less manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group.
Christa Pike
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠15%Christa Pike (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,460
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510014.3% percentile
1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos