Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 456 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Mad Dog Russo results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 42.7% saturation with 779 hits . Analysis detected 4,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,824 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,224 of 37,536 keywords). This Chris Mad Dog Russo is worse (more manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group. Chris Mad Dog Russo
Keyword details
Total words: 1,824
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.4% percentile 5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 42.7% 42.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 21.7% 21.7% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.7% 13.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 42.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 1.7% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 0.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.0% Red Herring: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst