Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,034 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Hansen results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 952 hits . Analysis detected 5,040 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,103 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (15,844 of 36,868 keywords). This Chris Hansen is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group. Chris Hansen
Keyword details
Total words: 6,103
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.0% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.6% 15.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst