Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video255 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chino Hills results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Loss Aversion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 379 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,835 of 37,536 keywords). This Chino Hills is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Chino Hills
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
45%Chino Hills (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,020
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

45% percentile
025507510044.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos