Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chinese Spy results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 798 hits . Analysis detected 6,176 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,756 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,993 of 37,536 keywords). This Chinese Spy is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group. Chinese Spy
Keyword details
Total words: 4,756
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.1% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst