Keyword summary
74% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Nutrition Fraud results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 1,083 hits . Analysis detected 6,543 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,542 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,550 of 37,536 keywords). This Child Nutrition Fraud is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group. Child Nutrition Fraud
Keyword details
Total words: 4,542
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.9% percentile 4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.8% 23.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst