Keyword summary
79% 1 analyzed article/video 993 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Hunger results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 588 hits . Analysis detected 2,869 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,979 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,831 of 37,536 keywords). This Child Hunger is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group. Child Hunger
Keyword details
Total words: 2,979
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 19.7% 19.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 5.2% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst