Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 782 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Care Subsidies results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 503 hits . Analysis detected 3,114 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,128 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (14,273 of 37,530 keywords). This Child Care Subsidies is worse (more manipulative) than 62.00% of the peer group. Child Care Subsidies
Keyword details
Total words: 3,128
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.0% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst